<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New.Journalism.Review &#187; InDesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newjournalismreview.com/category/indesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newjournalismreview.com</link>
	<description>Research about online journalism education in the UK. Blogged by a university lecturer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Quark 8 versus InDesign CS4 &#8211; a review</title>
		<link>http://newjournalismreview.com/2009/04/05/quark-8-versus-indesign-cs4-a-review/</link>
		<comments>http://newjournalismreview.com/2009/04/05/quark-8-versus-indesign-cs4-a-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InDesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InDesign CS4 Quark 8 DTP Magazine production Mac User]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newjournalismreview.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mac User UK (13th March issue) did a comparison review of Quark 8 versus InDesign CS4. It concludes: &#34;The question of which to buy is a tricky one. Certainly, XPress 8 will give the Adobe team something to worry about for their next release - but it&#39;s about time they had some real competition&#8230;.There are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newjournalismreview.com/2009/04/05/quark-8-versus-indesign-cs4-a-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quark 8: AKA &#8220;InDesign killer&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://newjournalismreview.com/2008/06/17/quark-8-aka-indesign-killer/</link>
		<comments>http://newjournalismreview.com/2008/06/17/quark-8-aka-indesign-killer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InDesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InDesign CS4 Quark 8 DTP Magazine production Mac User]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newjournalismreview.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Quark Strikes Back&#8221; reads the dramatic headline on the cover of  MacUser magazine (6 June 2008) It says: &#8220;We didn&#8217;t expect to feel like this, XPress 8 seems like a product that will get people excited about DTP once more.&#8221; A few years ago the canteen at Quark HQ in Denver had one dish on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newjournalismreview.com/2008/06/17/quark-8-aka-indesign-killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

